Skip to main content

CIPR

  • Home
  • About
    • Annual reports
  • People
    • Executives
    • Academics
    • Professional staff
    • Research officers
    • Visitors
      • Past visitors
    • Current PhD students
    • Graduated PhD students
  • Publications
    • Policy Insights: Special Series
    • Commissioned Reports
    • Working Papers
    • Discussion Papers
    • Topical Issues
    • Research Monographs
    • 2011 Census papers
    • 2016 Census papers
    • People on Country
    • Talk, Text and Technology
    • Culture Crisis
    • The Macquarie Atlas of Indigenous Australia
    • Indigenous Futures
    • Information for authors
  • Events
    • Workshops
    • Event series
  • News
  • Students
    • Study with us
  • Research
    • Key research areas
    • Visiting Indigenous Fellowship
    • Past projects
      • Indigenous Researcher-in-Residence
      • Sustainable Indigenous Entrepreneurs
      • Indigenous Population
        • Publications
        • 2011 Lecture Series
      • New Media
        • Western Desert Special Speech Styles Project
      • People On Country
        • Project overview
          • Advisory committee
          • Funding
          • Research partners
          • Research team
        • Project partners
          • Dhimurru
          • Djelk
          • Garawa
          • Waanyi/Garawa
          • Warddeken
          • Yirralka Rangers
          • Yugul Mangi
        • Research outputs
          • Publications
          • Reports
          • Newsletters
          • Project documents
      • Indigenous Governance
        • Publications
        • Annual reports
        • Reports
        • Case studies
        • Newsletters
        • Occasional papers
        • Miscellaneous documents
      • Education Futures
        • Indigenous Justice Workshop
        • Research outputs
        • Research summaries
  • Contact us

Research Spotlight

  • Zero Carbon Energy
    • Publications and Submissions
  • Market value for Indigenous Knowledge
  • Indigenous public servants
  • Urban Indigenous Research Network
    • About
    • People
    • Events
    • News
    • Project & Networks
      • ANU Women in Indigenous Policy and Law Research Network (WIPLRN)
      • ANU Development and Governance Research Network (DGRNET)
      • Reconfiguring New Public Management
        • People
        • NSW survey
    • Publications
    • Contact

Related Sites

  • ANU College of Arts & Social Sciences
  • Research School of Social Sciences
  • Australian National Internships Program

Administrator

Breadcrumb

HomeResearchPublicationsThe Fiscal Equalisation Model: Options For ATSIC's Future Funding Policy and Practice
The fiscal equalisation model: options for ATSIC's future funding policy and practice
Author/editor: Smith, D
Year published: 1993
Issue no.: 42

Abstract

The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (ATSIC) currently lacks integrated policy guidelines for its distribution of funds at regional, state and national levels. Smith (1993) examined ATSIC's existing financial powers and budgetary processes and argued that its financial objectives and the developing role of regional councils are hindered by the lack of funding policy and by an overly complex, functionally-based program structure. It was suggested that ATSIC needed a funding model based on distributive equity, where program expenditure would be allocated on the basis of relative need.

The present discussion paper develops the analysis of ATSIC's current funding role, suggesting that future funding policy and practice should be focused at the regional council level and equitably account for relative levels of Indigenous socioeconomic disadvantage, as well as between Indigenous peoples and the wider Australian population.

ATSIC is currently reassessing its methods for distributing financial resources to Indigenous organisations and communities and considering the relevance of horizontal fiscal equalisation. This paper examines the principle and methods of fiscal equalisation used by the Commonwealth Grants Commission and critically investigates its suitability as a future basis for ATSIC's allocation of funds to regional councils. While the paper is exploratory, it suggests that the principle of equalisation provides a potentially valuable distributive framework for ATSIC, but one which would require substantial modification. In conclusion, a number of issues associated with the use of equalisation are considered, including data management; implications for ATSIC's program structure; for government funding more broadly; and for ATSIC's potential co-ordinating role at the intergovernmental and interagency level.

ISBN: 0 7315 1716 4

ISSN:1036 1774

File attachments

AttachmentSize
1993_DP42_0.pdf(4.03 MB)4.03 MB